Skip to main content

Patients Who Google

I read an article in Time Magazine from a Dr. Haig who couldn't tolerate a patient who "googled" him, her health conditions and treatments. It made me stop and think about patients who "google". They often send me articles they have discovered about their illness or bring information they have downloaded. Many times the information is not exactly evidence based nor well researched. There are a plethora of experts with "Doctor" in front of their name that tout research that was published in an obscure journal. Other times it is anecdotal or advertisements. The internet can be a wonderful thing but one needs the ability to sift through the junk. When it comes to health, that is my role.

Despite the fact that there is very little a patient can bring me that I don't already know...I don't disdain the effort. An involved patient is one I can work with. I try to show respect for whatever product or treatment they are asking about but I don't hesitate to give "the other side of the story" if there is evidence against it. Many times it wont hurt anything but their pocketbook and I tell them so.

Here is what I don't like, however. I don't like it when a patient wants me to research something obscure. If they have heard of a new medication or treatment that is not yet proven, I ask them to get the information and I'll review it. According to a recent study in Annals of Internal Medicine, primary care physicians already spend almost an entire DAY a week doing unreimbursed work between patient visits. I want the patient to do the "googling", not me. I'll do the interpreting, if asked, at the time of the next office visit.


Jen said…
I've found that most of our doctors appreciate it if I can bring them any new information...with 3 kids with multiple conditions, I don't expect our pediatrician or specialists to be completely up to date on everything that affects our family...they have hundreds of patients with different conditions, and I only have about 5 things that I need to read up on.

If I read about something new and interesting I'll print it out and give it to them at our next visit, but I'm fully conscious that they know a lot more than I do, and I'm lucky that I trust their judgment.

I don't think that there's anything wrong with googling and passing on information as long as you use some common sense- I have very little interest in snake-oil or non-peer-reviewed "treatments" or meds, so generally it seems to work out fairly well for all of us.
Anonymous said…
If you have a condition like Fibromyalgia as I do then it is not unusual to find doctors who know very little about the condition. I crossed the line from expert-patient (someone who is expert in how their condition affects them) to patient expert (an expert who just happens to be a patient too) a while ago and I have only ever met 2 doctors who know as much as me about my condition, even at conferences aimed at medical professionals.

Popular posts from this blog

scintillating scotoma

image from myaspiebrain Nothing like experiencing a medical condition first-hand to really help a doctor understand it from the patient's point of view.  After all these years, I had my first (and hopefully last) scintillating scotoma while sitting on the couch playing "words with friends" on my ipad and watching TV.  A scotoma is a partial loss of vision in a normal visual field.  Scintillate is flashing, sparkles.  Put them together and you have moving, flashing sparkles with a blind spot in your eyes. This visual aura was first described in the 19th century  by a Dr. Hubert Airy who had migraine headaches.  The visual sparks and flashes are in a zig-zag pattern and they can precede a migraine headache or occur without any pain.   The scotoma affects both eyes and closing one or the other does not make it go away.  Sometimes the term "ocular migraine" or "retinal migraine"  are used to describe this phenomenon but these involve only one eye, not

Do Doctors Make Too Much Money?

An article in the New York Times says the reason health care costs are so high in the United States is because doctors are paid too much. I saw that and my eyes bugged out. I just came home from a meeting with physicians and hospital administrators and the entire meeting was spent discussing the financial challenges physicians face in keeping their doors open to see patients. The goal of this meeting was to keep health services in that community so patients will have someone to care for them. Not a person in the room would agree that the doctors earn too much. Physicians paid too much? Lets break that down. A doctor spends a minimum of 11 years in education and training after the age of 18. Many are in training for 15 or more years. They are living on student loans and contributing zero to their family's income until the residency years. At that time they earn less than minimum wage if you factor in the 80-100 hour workweek. When a doctor emerges from training (and believe

Spots on the Scrotum

The answer to yesterday's Image Challenge was #2 - Fordyce's angiokeratomas. Like many unusual medical names, the condition was first described by John Addison Fordyce in 1896. These tiny blood vessels (capillaries) are under the superficial dermis and can be found on both men and women in the scrotum and vulva area.  They are painless and appear in the 2nd and third decade and may continue to appear as the person ages. Fordyce's angiokeratomas should not be confused with warts, herpes or other conditions.  They are completely benign and require no treatment. There are a number of chat rooms on-line where men are concerned about these lesions and want them removed by laser.  That can be an expensive and time consuming treatment and there is no guarantee that they will not recur.   The best treatment is awareness and acceptance that every body is varied and Fordyce angiokeratoma is just another appearance. Thanks everyone for your guesses and great diagnostic a